:The fallacy that best describes this reasoning is the fallacy of division.
2.
:Ok the point here is that fallacy of division is the more appropriate fallacy, rather than affirming the consequent.
3.
The fallacy of composition is the converse of the fallacy of division; it may be contrasted with the case of emergence, where the whole possesses properties " not " present in the parts.
4.
It's mostly you and Cyclopia using the argument from authority and the fallacy of division against a mixed bag of genuine sources that contradict your position along with a lot of incomprehensible jibber-jabber on everyone's part ( and I include myself ).
5.
In the philosophy of the ancient Greek Anaxagoras, as claimed by the Roman atomist Lucretius, it was assumed that the atoms constituting a substance must themselves have the salient observed properties of that substance : so atoms of water would be wet, atoms of iron would be hard, atoms of wool would be soft, etc . This doctrine is called " homoeomeria ", and it depends on the fallacy of division.
मोबाइल